
Level 1 Assets
Level 1 assets include listed stocks, bonds, funds, or any assets that have a regular mark-to-market mechanism for setting a fair market value. Level 1 assets are the top classification based on their transparency and how reliably their fair market value can be calculated. Level 2 and 3 assets are less liquid and more difficult to quickly and correctly ascertain their fair value. Publicly traded companies must classify all of their assets based on the ease that they can be valued, with Level 1 assets being the easiest. Financial Accounting Standard 157 (FAS 157) established a single consistent framework for estimating fair value in the absence of quoted prices, based on the notion of an “exit price” and a three-level hierarchy to reflect the level of judgment involved in estimating fair values, ranging from market-based prices to illiquid Level 3 assets where no observable market exists and valuations have to be based on proprietary internal information, like the most recent funding round. Level 1 assets include listed stocks, bonds, funds, or any assets that have a regular mark-to-market mechanism for setting a fair market value. The classification system including Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 under (FASB) Statement 157 required public companies to allocate all assets based on the reliability of fair market values.
What Are Level 1 Assets?
Level 1 assets include listed stocks, bonds, funds, or any assets that have a regular mark-to-market mechanism for setting a fair market value. These assets are considered to have a readily observable, transparent prices, and therefore a reliable fair market value.
Understanding Level 1 Assets
Publicly traded companies must classify all of their assets based on the ease that they can be valued, with Level 1 assets being the easiest. A big part of valuing assets comes from market depth and liquidity. For developed markets, robust market activity acts as a natural price discovery mechanism. This, in turn, is a core element to market liquidity, which is a related gauge measuring a market’s ability to purchase or sell an asset without causing a significant change in the asset’s price.
Financial Accounting Standard 157 (FAS 157) established a single consistent framework for estimating fair value in the absence of quoted prices, based on the notion of an “exit price” and a three-level hierarchy to reflect the level of judgment involved in estimating fair values, ranging from market-based prices to illiquid Level 3 assets where no observable market exists and valuations have to be based on proprietary internal information, like the most recent funding round.
Classifying Level 1 Assets
The classification system including Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 under (FASB) Statement 157 required public companies to allocate all assets based on the reliability of fair market values.
The statement went into effect for all fiscal years after 2007 and came about largely as a result of the credit market turbulence surrounding subprime mortgages and related securitized assets like asset-backed securities (ABS). Many assets became illiquid and fair value pricing could only be done by internal estimates or other mark-to-model procedures during 2007's credit crunch. As such, regulators needed a way to inform investors about securities where value could be open to interpretation.
Advantages of Level 1 Assets
Level 1 assets are one way to measure the strength and reliability of an entity’s balance sheet. Because the valuation of Level 1 assets is dependable, certain businesses can enjoy incremental benefits relative to another business with fewer Level 1 assets. For example, banks, investors, and regulators look favorably on an entity with a majority of assets that have a market-based valuation because they can rely on supplied financial statements. If a business heavily uses derivatives and a majority of its assets fall into the Level 2 or 3 category, then interested parties are less comfortable with the valuation of these assets.
The issue with assets outside Level 1 is best displayed during times of distress. Naturally, during a volatile market, liquidity and market depth erode and many assets will not enjoy a reasonable price discovery mechanism. These assets then need to be valued by appraisals or according to a model. Both of these are less than perfect methods, so investors and creditors often lose confidence in reported valuations. During periods of peak uncertainty, such as during the depths of the Great Recession, Level 3 assets are especially scrutinized — with pundits calling mark-to-model methods more like mark-to-myth.
Related terms:
Asset-Backed Security (ABS)
An asset-backed security (ABS) is a debt security collateralized by a pool of assets. read more
Credit Market and Examples
The credit market is where investors buy bonds and other credit-related securities. It is also where governments and corporations raise funds. read more
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is an independent organization that sets accounting standards for companies and nonprofits in the United States. read more
Financial Accounting Standard 157 (FAS 157)
Now known as Accounting Standards Code Topic 820, FAS 157 is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)’s fair value accounting standard. read more
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
GAAP is a common set of generally accepted accounting principles, standards, and procedures that public companies in the U.S. must follow when they compile their financial statements. read more
The Great Recession
The Great Recession was a sharp decline in economic activity during the late 2000s and was the largest economic downturn since the Great Depression. read more
Level 2 Assets
Level 2 assets do not have regular market pricing although a fair value can be determined based on other data values or market prices. read more
Level 3 Assets
Level 3 assets are financial assets and liabilities whose fair value cannot be easily determined. read more
Liquidity
Liquidity refers to the ease with which an asset, or security, can be converted into ready cash without affecting its market price. read more
Mark-To-Market Losses
Market-to-market losses are losses generated through an accounting entry rather than the actual sale of a security. Mark-to-market losses can occur when financial instruments held are valued at the current market value. read more