Delphi Method

Delphi Method

The Delphi method is a forecasting process framework based on the results of multiple rounds of questionnaires sent to a panel of experts. The Delphi method is a process of arriving at group consensus by providing experts with rounds of questionnaires, as well as the group response before each subsequent round. The group facilitator selects a group of experts based on the topic being examined and sends them a questionnaire with instructions to comment on each topic based on their personal opinion, experience, or previous research. Several rounds of questionnaires are sent out to the group of experts, and the anonymous responses are aggregated and shared with the group after each round. The Delphi method is a forecasting process framework based on the results of multiple rounds of questionnaires sent to a panel of experts.

The Delphi method is a process used to arrive at a group opinion or decision by surveying a panel of experts.

What Is the Delphi Method?

The Delphi method is a forecasting process framework based on the results of multiple rounds of questionnaires sent to a panel of experts. After each round of questionnaires, the experts are presented with an aggregated summary of the last round, allowing each expert to adjust their answers according to the group response. This process combines the benefits of expert analysis with elements of the wisdom of crowds.

The Delphi method is a process used to arrive at a group opinion or decision by surveying a panel of experts.
Experts respond to several rounds of questionnaires, and the responses are aggregated and shared with the group after each round.
The experts can adjust their answers each round, based on how they interpret the "group response" provided to them.
The ultimate result is meant to be a true consensus of what the group thinks.

Understanding the Delphi Method

Several rounds of questionnaires are sent out to the group of experts, and the anonymous responses are aggregated and shared with the group after each round. The experts are allowed to adjust their answers in subsequent rounds, based on how they interpret the "group response" that has been provided to them. Since multiple rounds of questions are asked and the panel is told what the group thinks as a whole, the Delphi method seeks to reach the correct response through consensus.

The Delphi method was originally conceived in the 1950s by Olaf Helmer and Norman Dalkey of the Rand Corporation. The name refers to the Oracle of Delphi, a priestess at a temple of Apollo in ancient Greece known for her prophecies. The Delphi method allows experts to work toward a mutual agreement by conducting a circulating series of questionnaires and releasing related feedback to further the discussion with each subsequent round. The experts' responses shift as rounds are completed based on the information brought forth by other experts participating in the analysis.

The Delphi method seeks to aggregate opinions from a diverse set of experts, and it can be done without having to bring everyone together for a physical meeting. Since the responses of the participants are anonymous, individual panelists don't have to worry about repercussions for their opinions. Consensus can be reached over time as opinions are swayed, making the method very effective.

However, while the Delphi method allows for commentary from a diverse group of participants, it does not result in the same sort of interactions as a live discussion. A live discussion can sometimes produce a better example of consensus, as ideas and perceptions are introduced, broken down, and reassessed. Response times with the Delphi method can be long, which slows the rate of discussion. It is also possible that the information received back from the experts will provide no innate value.

The Delphi method is a process of arriving at group consensus by providing experts with rounds of questionnaires, as well as the group response before each subsequent round.

Delphi Method Process

First, the group facilitator selects a group of experts based on the topic being examined. Once all participants are confirmed, each member of the group is sent a questionnaire with instructions to comment on each topic based on their personal opinion, experience, or previous research.

The questionnaires are returned to the facilitator who groups the comments and prepares copies of the information. A copy of the compiled comments is sent to each participant, along with the opportunity to comment further. At the end of each comment session, all questionnaires are returned to the facilitator who decides if another round is necessary or if the results are ready for publishing.

The questionnaire rounds can be repeated as many times as necessary to achieve a general sense of consensus.

What Are the Advantages of the Delphi Method?

The Delphi method seeks to aggregate opinions from a diverse set of experts, and it can be done without having to bring everyone together for a physical meeting. Since the responses of the participants are anonymous, individual panelists don't have to worry about repercussions for their opinions. Consensus can be reached over time as opinions are swayed, making the method very effective.

What Are the Disadvantages of the Delphi Method?

The Delphi method does not result in the same sort of interactions as a live discussion. A live discussion can sometimes produce a better example of consensus, as ideas and perceptions are introduced, broken down, and reassessed. Response times with the Delphi method can be long, which slows the rate of discussion. It is also possible that the information received back from the experts will provide no innate value.

How Is the Delphi Method Conducted?

The group facilitator selects a group of experts based on the topic being examined and sends them a questionnaire with instructions to comment on each topic based on their personal opinion, experience, or previous research.

The facilitator groups the comments from the returned questionnaires and sends copies to each participant, along with the opportunity to comment further. At the end of this session, the questionnaires are returned to the facilitator who decides if another round is necessary or if the results are ready for publishing.

This process can be repeated multiple times until a general sense of consensus is reached.

Related terms:

Brown Bag Meeting

A brown bag meeting is an informal meeting that occurs in the workplace generally around lunchtime. read more

Cryptocurrency : What Is Cryptocurrency?

A cryptocurrency is a digital or virtual currency that uses cryptography and is difficult to counterfeit because of this security feature. read more

Feasibility Study : How Does It Work?

A feasibility study analyzes all relevant factors of a project to determine the possibility and probability of completing it successfully. read more

Forecasting

Forecasting is a technique that uses historical data as inputs to make informed estimates that are predictive in determining the direction of future trends. read more

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

GAAP is a common set of generally accepted accounting principles, standards, and procedures that public companies in the U.S. must follow when they compile their financial statements. read more

Meeting of the Minds

A meeting of the minds occurs when comprehension of and mutual agreement on all terms of a contract have been acknowledged by the parties involved. read more

Sample Selection Bias

Sample selection bias is a type of bias caused by using non-random data for statistical analysis. Learn ways to avoid sample selection bias. read more

Wisdom of Crowds

Wisdom of crowds is the idea that large groups of people are collectively smarter than individual experts when it comes to problem-solving. read more