Closet Indexing

Closet Indexing

Closet indexing is a strategy used to describe funds that claim to actively purchase investments but wind up with a portfolio not much different from the benchmark. Closet indexing is a fund purchasing strategy that claims to actively purchase investments, but winds up with a portfolio very similar to its benchmark. Typically looked upon negatively, closet indexing results in higher fees for investors that pay a management fee for fund managers that simply mirror an index fund, displaying a false sense of management abilities. Metrics such as R squared and active share can help determine a portfolio's statistical deviation from the benchmark index, and hence if it is a closet index. In the end, active funds that beat benchmark returns tend to have lower fees than the traditional actively managed fund. A manager's performance is usually compared to a benchmark index, so there is an incentive for managers to gain returns that are at least like the index.

Closet indexing is a fund purchasing strategy that claims to actively purchase investments, but winds up with a portfolio very similar to its benchmark.

What Is Closet Indexing?

Closet indexing is a strategy used to describe funds that claim to actively purchase investments but wind up with a portfolio not much different from the benchmark. By doing so, portfolio managers achieve returns similar to an underlying benchmark, like the S&P 500, without exactly replicating the index. The motivation for closet indexing grows out of years of poor performance and the ongoing shift from active to passive management. Flows out of active and into passive funds have topped hundreds of millions in assets under management for multiple years. This has put pressure on fund managers who fear the passive industry will eliminate stock-picking jobs. 

Closet indexing is a fund purchasing strategy that claims to actively purchase investments, but winds up with a portfolio very similar to its benchmark.
Typically looked upon negatively, closet indexing results in higher fees for investors that pay a management fee for fund managers that simply mirror an index fund, displaying a false sense of management abilities.
Metrics such as R squared and active share can help determine a portfolio's statistical deviation from the benchmark index, and hence if it is a closet index.

How Closet Indexing Works

Closet indexing might stick to an index in terms of weighting, industry sector, or geography. A manager's performance is usually compared to a benchmark index, so there is an incentive for managers to gain returns that are at least like the index. Even if the fund performs slightly worse than the benchmark net of all fees, the manager is touted for their stock-picking ability. 

Closet indexing is often viewed negatively by investors because they could simply choose an index fund and pay lower fees. On the surface, it might be difficult to identify if a fund practices closet indexing but a closer look at the prospectus can uncover a fund's true holdings. There are a few ways to spot funds that replicate a benchmark index.

Tools like R Squared and tracking error determines a portfolio's statistical deviation from the benchmark index. R Squared is by definition a statistical measure that represents the percentage a fund deviates or conforms to a benchmark. Meanwhile, tracking error depicts the difference between a fund's returns and the benchmark, otherwise known as active risk. Another metric to look at is the active share, which establishes the percentage of holdings that differ from the benchmark index. A portfolio with an active share between 20% and 60% is considered a closet indexer. 

20% to 60%

The range of an active share reflecting a closet indexer.

Drawbacks of Closet Indexing

The biggest issue investors have with closet indexing is the high fees that active managers continue to charge, despite taking a passive approach. Investors wind up taking the brunt of this indiscretion because they pay higher fees for similar or mediocre performance. However, choosing a fund with a high active share won't necessarily translate to better returns. In the end, active funds that beat benchmark returns tend to have lower fees than the traditional actively managed fund.

Related terms:

Active Share Study

The active share study refers to an academic study conducted by researchers from the Yale School of Management in 2006. read more

Benchmark

A benchmark is a standard against which the performance of a security, mutual fund or investment manager can be measured. read more

Enhanced Indexing

Enhanced indexing is an investment approach that attempts to amplify the returns of an underlying portfolio or index. read more

Index Fund

An index fund is a pooled investment vehicle that passively seeks to replicate the returns of some market indexes. read more

Index Hugger

An index hugger is a managed mutual fund that tends to perform much like a benchmark index. read more

Passive Management Defined

Passive management refers to index- and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) which have no active manager and typically lower fees.  read more

R-Squared

R-squared is a statistical measure that represents the proportion of the variance for a dependent variable that's explained by an independent variable.  read more

Risk Management in Finance

In the financial world, risk management is the process of identification, analysis, and acceptance or mitigation of uncertainty in investment decisions. read more

S&P 500 Index – Standard & Poor's 500 Index

The S&P 500 Index (the Standard & Poor's 500 Index) is a market-capitalization-weighted index of the 500 largest publicly traded companies in the U.S. read more