
Baby Bills and History
Baby Bills is a nickname for the smaller companies Microsoft (MSFT) _would have_ been broken into if Microsoft had been forced to dissolve after having been found guilty of violating antitrust laws in 1999. The phrase Baby Bills was a portmanteau of Baby Bells and Bill Gates, or a collection of smaller companies resulting from Bill Gates: babies of Bill. Microsoft wasn't required to break up in 2000, but if it had been the smaller companies that would have resulted are referred to as Baby Bills. Baby Bills is a nickname for the smaller companies Microsoft (MSFT) _would have_ been broken into if Microsoft had been forced to dissolve after having been found guilty of violating antitrust laws in 1999. In 2000, a judge ordered Microsoft to break apart into smaller companies, but an agreement was reached in 2001 that allowed Microsoft to stay intact as a single company. In 1993 the FTC deadlocked on whether Microsoft had abused its monopoly, but at the same time the Department of Justice (DOJ), opened its own investigation into Microsoft as a monopoly and whether or not the company was exploiting the monopoly.

What are Baby Bills?
Baby Bills is a nickname for the smaller companies Microsoft (MSFT) would have been broken into if Microsoft had been forced to dissolve after having been found guilty of violating antitrust laws in 1999.
In 2000, a judge ordered Microsoft to break apart into smaller companies, but an agreement was reached in 2001 that allowed Microsoft to stay intact as a single company. The phrase Baby Bills was a portmanteau of Baby Bells and Bill Gates, or a collection of smaller companies resulting from Bill Gates: babies of Bill.



Understanding Baby Bills
Baby Bills is a joke nickname for the companies software giant Microsoft would have been required to split up into had the antitrust order of June 7, 2000 stood.
In 1990, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) began an investigation into whether Microsoft had a monopoly on operating systems for PC computers. In 1993 the FTC deadlocked on whether Microsoft had abused its monopoly, but at the same time the Department of Justice (DOJ), opened its own investigation into Microsoft as a monopoly and whether or not the company was exploiting the monopoly.
In 1994 the DOJ ruled that Microsoft was not allowed to attach other Microsoft products to the MS operating system. In essence the DOJ was trying to limit Microsoft's monopoly power only to the operating system and prevent it from achieving monopolies in other types of products.
Microsoft was in the process of developing de facto monopolies in word processing and spreadsheet software as other products were losing market share, and the Justice was attempting to mitigate this.
Microsoft continued to bundle Internet Explorer along with the MS operating system and claimed that it was a feature and not a product. The DOJ and 21 Attorneys General sued Microsoft for this, and the trial began in 1998. In 1999 Microsoft was found guilty of having and abusing a monopoly.
On June 7, 2000 Microsoft was ordered to break up into smaller companies, one of which would have contained the operating systems, one of which would have contained software applications, and a third of which would have had internet and ecommerce systems.
These hypothetical companies were referred to as Baby Bills. In 2001 Microsoft reached an agreement with the DOJ to open up its programming interfaces to third-party companies to develop software for the MS operating system. Microsoft was not forced to break up into smaller companies.
Meaning of ‘Baby Bills’
Baby Bills is a portmanteau of Baby Bells and Bill Gates, CEO and founder of Microsoft. Baby Bells refers to the smaller companies formed when the AT&T (T) telephone monopoly, called "Ma Bell," was ordered to disband in 1982.
Examples of Other Microsoft Legal Battles
In 2008 the European Union (EU) fined MSFT €899. The fine was related to what the EU viewed as unreasonable royalty fees MSFT charged for providing other companies with information which would make their software compatible with the Windows operating system.
The royalty fees were introduced after a 2004 antitrust case against Microsoft determined that it withheld information from other companies with the intent to limit those company's ability to make software compatible with Windows.
Microsoft began providing the necessary information to other companies, for a royalty. This royalty declined over time, under pressure from the EU, but Microsoft was still fined for the years in which the EU viewed the royalty as punitively high.
Related terms:
Baby Bells
The Baby Bells were the U.S. regional telephone companies that were formed following the breakup of AT&T's monopoly, commonly referred to Ma Bell, n 1984. read more
Celtic Tiger
Celtic Tiger refers to the country of Ireland during its economic boom years between 1995 and around 2007. read more
Extortion
Extortion is the wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or intimidation to gain money or property from an individual or entity. read more
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
The FTC is an independent agency that aims to protect consumers and ensure a competitive market by enforcing consumer protection and antitrust laws. read more
Megamerger
A megamerger is the joining of two large corporations, typically in a transaction worth billions of dollars, into one new legal entity. read more
Monopoly
A monopoly is the domination of an industry by a single company, to the point of excluding all other viable competitors. read more
Peter R. Dolan
Peter. R. Dolan is the chair of the board of Allied Minds Inc. and the former CEO of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. read more