Least-Preferred Coworker Scale

Least-Preferred Coworker Scale

The least-preferred coworker scale, developed by American scholar Fred Fiedler, identifies whether an individual's leadership style is either relationship-oriented or task-oriented. The LPC scale assumes that people whose leadership style is relationship-oriented tend to describe their least preferred coworkers in a more positive manner, while those whose style is task-oriented rate them more negatively. The least-preferred coworker scale (LPC) is a management heuristic that assigns an individual's leadership style as either task-oriented or relationship-oriented. The least-preferred coworker scale, developed by American scholar Fred Fiedler, identifies whether an individual's leadership style is either relationship-oriented or task-oriented. A high LPC score indicates that the individual is a relationship-oriented leader, while a low LPC score suggests a task-oriented leader.

The least-preferred coworker scale (LPC) is a management heuristic that assigns an individual's leadership style as either task-oriented or relationship-oriented.

What Is the Least-Preferred Coworker Scale?

The least-preferred coworker scale, developed by American scholar Fred Fiedler, identifies whether an individual's leadership style is either relationship-oriented or task-oriented.

The least preferred coworker (LPC) scale requires a person to rate the one individual they would least want to work with — the least-preferred coworker — using a range of 18 to 25 bipolar (positive or negative) adjectives, with ratings from 1 to 8. The LPC score is then computed by totaling all the ratings. A high LPC score indicates that the individual is a relationship-oriented leader, while a low LPC score suggests a task-oriented leader.

The least-preferred coworker scale (LPC) is a management heuristic that assigns an individual's leadership style as either task-oriented or relationship-oriented.
The scale utilizes a subjective evaluation of an individual's attitudes toward their least favorable coworker.
By seeing how one responds to evaluating the one person they'd least prefer to work with, overall management style can be inferred.
The leadership-member relationship is a barometer of how much influence and trust exists between the team and its leader.
The model presented by the scale presents the notion that no single leadership style is perfect or ideal, as the needs change depending on circumstances and context.

How the Least-Preferred Coworker Scale Works

A typical set of bipolar adjectives used in the LPC scale would include pleasant or unpleasant, friendly or unfriendly, supportive or hostile, and so on. The responses are graded from 1 for the least favorable attribute (for example, unpleasant or unfriendly), to 8 for the most favorable one (pleasant or friendly).

The LPC scale assumes that people whose leadership style is relationship-oriented tend to describe their least preferred coworkers in a more positive manner, while those whose style is task-oriented rate them more negatively.

Applying the Least Preferred Coworker Scale

The model presented by the scale presents the notion that no single leadership style is perfect or ideal, as the needs change depending on circumstances and context. For instance, a team that is comprised of veteran professionals who are well-versed in their tasks may be served best by a relationship-oriented style of leadership. The team does not require the heavy-handed approach that a less experienced team might, which could include strict guidelines in order to ensure the task is accomplished.

Similarly, a veteran team might need task-oriented leadership if there is a short deadline to complete the objectives or if the goals include sensitive milestones that will be difficult to achieve. If the team is made up of both veteran professionals and untrained staff, the situational needs of the objective and could mean leadership styles may change based on the moment or the individuals who need guidance.

Special Considerations

Situational favorableness also plays a role in the leadership style adopted. The leadership-member relationship is a barometer of how much influence and trust exists between the team and its leader. If this bond is weak, the leader can be said to hold a weak position in this regard. This can be swayed by the leader’s position of power in the organization.

The amount of power and authority a leader has to direct the team who works for them might be described as strong, meaning they have clear control to see their mandates are followed. If that power is weak, they have less control over the team to ensure the action that is taken.

Related terms:

Fiduciary

A fiduciary is a person or organization that acts on behalf of a person or persons and is legally bound to act solely in their best interests. read more

Glass Cliff

Glass cliff refers to the tendency of groups, organizations, or political parties to put women in power during times of crisis or downturn when the chance of failure is more likely. read more

Company Guidance

Company guidance is the information that a company provides to investors as an indication or estimate of its earnings for the quarter or year ahead. read more

Hersey-Blanchard Model

The Hersey-Blanchard Model suggests there is no single leadership style that is better than another. read more

Leadership

Leadership in business alludes to the ability of a company's management to make sound decisions and inspire others to perform well. read more

Michigan Leadership Studies

An exploration into leadership styles, the Michigan Leadership Studies sought to identify what led to greater productivity. read more

Neuroeconomics

Neuroeconomics aims to link economics, psychology, and neuroscience to better understand economic decision-making. read more

Rating

A rating is an assessment tool assigned by an analyst or rating agency to a stock or bond indicating its potential for opportunity or safety. read more

Servant Leadership

Servant leadership is a leadership philosophy in which an individual interacts with others with the aim of achieving authority rather than power.  read more