Gorilla

Gorilla

A "gorilla" is the term used to describe a company that dominates its industry but does not necessarily have a complete monopoly. In business, a gorilla's huge size means that competitors must carefully consider the gorilla's potential reactions to certain business decisions. A gorilla does not need to have an official monopoly within an industry to dominate its competitors; however, its broad dominance in the industry may lead many people to view the situation as a de facto monopoly. While not an actual monopoly, because of its size and influence, a gorilla may be considered a de facto monopoly since competitors are sidelined. The use of the gorilla term is a reference to the fact that an 800-pound gorilla can essentially do whatever it wants.

A gorilla refers to a dominant company in some sector that does not have a monopoly but still enjoys a great deal of influence and pricing power.

What Is a Gorilla?

A "gorilla" is the term used to describe a company that dominates its industry but does not necessarily have a complete monopoly. A gorilla firm achieves its dominance through exerting control over the pricing and availability of its products relative to competitors in the industry. This influence on price control forces competitors to resort to alternative tactics to compete, such as through differentiating their offerings or aggressive marketing tactics.

A gorilla refers to a dominant company in some sector that does not have a monopoly but still enjoys a great deal of influence and pricing power.
While not an actual monopoly, because of its size and influence, a gorilla may be considered a de facto monopoly since competitors are sidelined.
Even as they are eyed carefully by anti-trust regulators, gorillas are able to attract top talent and obtain capital at favorable rates.

Understanding Gorillas

A gorilla does not need to have an official monopoly within an industry to dominate its competitors; however, its broad dominance in the industry may lead many people to view the situation as a de facto monopoly. The use of the gorilla term is a reference to the fact that an 800-pound gorilla can essentially do whatever it wants.

In business, a gorilla's huge size means that competitors must carefully consider the gorilla's potential reactions to certain business decisions. Many gorillas have a shot at monopolizing the market. However, federal antitrust laws, most notably the Sherman Act, make collusion and monopolistic behavior illegal in the United States. There is, however, still an incentive to compete with a gorilla. After all, an undetected price cut or increase in production will attract customers who are buying from the gorilla and customers who are not buying the product at all. Price adjustments may be subtle, including better credit terms, faster delivery, or other free services.

Gorillas are most effective when demand for the gorilla's product is not particularly price sensitive. This is why gorillas are more effective in the short term. Over the long term, prices often become elastic as consumers find cheaper substitutes for the product.

Benefits Accrue to Gorillas

Being a gorilla carries with it many benefits. For starters, the gorilla earns much higher margins, which enables them to reinvest in their business at a more rapid rate, further separating themselves from their competitors. Their dominant position provides a larger marketing platform, which allows the leader to better set the agenda for what customers should expect from their suppliers. Corporate partners prefer to work with gorillas, which can provide enormous endorsement and distribution benefits. Gorillas are typically able to attract the best job candidates, due to their size and prestige. They are also able to raise money more easily and cheaply than their competitors.

Example of a Gorilla

A modern example of a gorilla is the dominant position Microsoft enjoyed in the 1990s in the computer operating systems market. The competitive companies in this market segment were very small, had tiny market shares, and generally avoided facing Microsoft head on. Microsoft was able to drastically outspend these smaller companies on innovation and marketing, and it used that power to squeeze these tiny competitors on price and distribution.

Related terms:

Asset

An asset is a resource with economic value that an individual or corporation owns or controls with the expectation that it will provide a future benefit. read more

Duopoly

A duopoly is a situation where two companies own all or nearly all of the market for a given product or service; it is the most basic form of an oligopoly. read more

Market Leader Defintion

A company with the largest market share in an industry that can often use its dominance to affect the competitive landscape and direction the market takes. read more

Market Share

Market share shows the size of a company in relation to its market and its competitors by comparing the company’s sales to total industry sales. read more

Monopoly

A monopoly is the domination of an industry by a single company, to the point of excluding all other viable competitors. read more

Narrow Moat

A narrow economic moat is a competitive advantage that one company enjoys over competing firms operating in the same or similar type of industry. read more

Price Leadership

Price leadership occurs when a preeminent company determines the price of goods or services within its market and other firms in the sector follow suit. read more

Sherman Antitrust Act

The Sherman Antitrust Act is a landmark U.S. law, passed in 1890, which outlawed trusts—monopolies and cartels—to increase economic competitiveness. read more

Substitute

A substitute, or substitute good, is a product or service that a consumer sees as the same or similar to another product. read more