
Privatizing Profits And Socializing Losses
Privatizing profits and socializing losses refers to the practice of treating company earnings as the rightful property of shareholders and company losses as a responsibility that society must shoulder. Privatizing profits and socializing losses refers to the practice of treating company earnings as the rightful property of shareholders and company losses as a responsibility that society must shoulder. Privatizing profits and socializing losses is the practice of allowing shareholders to benefit from company earnings, while making society responsible for their losses. The phrase privatizing profits and socializing losses has a number of synonyms, including socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor, and lemon socialism. The phrase privatizing profits and socializing losses has a number of synonyms, including socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor, and lemon socialism.

More in Economy
What Is Privatizing Profits And Socializing Losses?
Privatizing profits and socializing losses refers to the practice of treating company earnings as the rightful property of shareholders and company losses as a responsibility that society must shoulder. In other words, the profitability of corporations are strictly for the benefit of their shareholders. But when the companies fail, the fallout — the losses and recovery — are the responsibility of the general public.




Understanding Privatizing Profits And Socializing Losses
The basis of this concept is that profits and losses are treated differently. When companies, even those that are publicly traded, are profitable, it's the shareholders who reap the rewards. Therefore, only a certain group of people benefit. But when the losses these companies experience are steep, taxpayers must bear the brunt.
The idea of privatizing profits and socializing losses generally comes in the form of some type of intervention from governments. This may be through bailouts or any number of subsidies.
Large corporations, their executives, and their shareholders are able to benefit from government subsidies and rescues in large part because of their ability to cultivate or buy influence through lobbyists. At the same time, defenders of controversial subsidies and bailouts contend that some firms are too big to fail.
This rationale is based on the assumption that allowing them to collapse would cause economic downturns and have much more dire effects on the working and middle-class population than rescues do. This was the basis for the bailouts given to the big banks and automakers following the economic crisis of 2007.
The people who defend controversial subsidies and bailouts contend that some firms are too big to fail and require losses to be socialized.
The phrase privatizing profits and socializing losses has a number of synonyms, including socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor, and lemon socialism. The latter was coined in a 1974 New York Times op-ed about New York State's decision to buy two half-finished power plants from the struggling electric utility ConEd for $500 million.
Example of Privatizing Profits And Socializing Losses
One of the most recent examples of privatizing profits and socializing losses is the post-financial crisis bailout of banks, insurers, and auto manufacturers.
The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) of 2008 authorized the United States Treasury under President Barack Obama's administration to spend $700 billion of taxpayer money to rescue these firms, many of which contributed to the crisis through reckless — and for a while, enormously profitable — investments in risky mortgage-backed derivatives. In reality, though, only $426.4 billion was actually used.
Some of the failing firms' employees were awarded multi-million dollar bonuses, despite accepting money from TARP and the Federal Reserve (Fed). By contrast, 861,664 families lost their homes to foreclosure in 2008. The media and public widely perceived this contrast as exemplifying the support rich people receive from the government at the expense of ordinary citizens.
Related terms:
Antitrust
Antitrust laws apply to virtually all industries and to every level of business, including manufacturing, transportation, distribution, and marketing. read more
Bailout
A bailout is an injection of money from a business, individual, or government into a failing company to prevent its demise and the ensuing consequences. read more
Corporate Governance : How It Works
Corporate governance is the set of rules, practices, and processes used to manage a company. Learn how corporate governance impacts your investments. read more
Disgorgement
Disgorgement is repayment of ill-gotten gains that is imposed on wrongdoers by the courts. Funds are paid back with interest to those affected. read more
Earmarking
Earmarking means to set money aside for a specific purpose, which applies to both individuals and organizations. read more
Earnings
A company's earnings are its after-tax net income, meaning its profits. Earnings are the main determinant of a public company's share price. read more
Federal Reserve System (FRS)
The Federal Reserve System, commonly known as the Fed, is the central bank of the U.S., which regulates the U.S. monetary and financial system. read more
Foreclosure
Foreclosure is the legal process by which a lender seizes and sells a home or property after a borrower is unable to fulfill their repayment obligation. read more
The Great Recession
The Great Recession was a sharp decline in economic activity during the late 2000s and was the largest economic downturn since the Great Depression. read more
Mortgage-Backed Security (MBS)
A mortgage-backed security (MBS) is an investment similar to a bond that consists of a bundle of home loans bought from the banks that issued them. read more